In a dramatic turn of international diplomacy, former U.S. President Donald Trump held a 90-minute phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, reshaping global geopolitics once again. While the potential end of the war in Ukraine is a welcome prospect, the likely terms of peace appear to grant significant concessions to Russia, effectively rewarding its illegal invasion.
A High-Stakes Negotiation
Three weeks into his presidency, Trump continues to upend the status quo. His direct engagement with Putin marks the first substantial U.S.-Russia communication in two years. Following the call, both leaders extended invitations for state visits and agreed to commence negotiations immediately.
READ MORE: UN Accuses Former Bangladesh Government of Possible Crimes Against Humanity
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, however, faces a precarious future. The nature of Trump’s diplomacy suggests that Ukraine may be pressured into accepting a settlement that secures peace but compromises its sovereignty. Trump’s hands-on approach—assuming the role of chief negotiator rather than delegating to his vice president or secretary of state—signals his belief in personal deal-making to resolve conflicts.
NATO Membership Off the Table
While details of any potential peace deal remain unclear, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed a critical blow to Ukraine’s long-term security: NATO membership is no longer a “realistic outcome.”
This decision undermines Ukraine’s principal defense strategy. NATO’s Article 5, which ensures collective defense for its members, would have acted as a deterrent against future Russian aggression. Without it, Ukraine remains vulnerable to further territorial ambitions from Moscow. Many in Kyiv fear that even if the war ends, the Kremlin’s aspirations to restore Soviet-era control over Ukraine will persist.
Crimea’s Fate Sealed
Another major revelation from Hegseth’s remarks was that a return to pre-2014 borders is no longer viable. This confirms that, under any Trump-brokered agreement, Russia will retain Crimea. Moscow’s annexation of the peninsula in 2014 met little resistance from the West, and Ukraine’s continued aspiration to reclaim Crimea appears to be fading under the weight of diplomatic realities.
Hegseth mentioned the inclusion of “robust security guarantees” for Ukraine, though specifics remain vague. The assurance that these guarantees will be “backed by capable European and non-European troops” raises questions about the extent of Western involvement in Ukraine’s defense post-war.
Trump’s Strategic Leverage
Trump’s negotiation tactics reflect his broader, transactional approach to foreign policy. In addition to peace talks, he has reportedly proposed that Ukraine supply the U.S. with critical minerals and rare earth elements in exchange for continued American support. This quid pro quo model positions the U.S. as a benefactor in economic terms while reshaping Ukraine’s post-war obligations.
This approach extends beyond Ukraine. Trump’s Middle East strategy—particularly his Gaza plan—further illustrates his willingness to push traditional diplomatic boundaries. His proposal to forcibly relocate Gaza’s 2.3 million residents to Egypt or Jordan in exchange for U.S. military aid highlights a broader pattern of leveraging American influence for strategic gains.
The Global Implications
Trump’s direct dialogue with Putin is undeniably significant. Given Russia’s extensive nuclear arsenal, open channels between the world’s two leading nuclear powers are essential. An end to the conflict in Ukraine would undoubtedly save countless lives and alleviate human suffering. However, the broader implications of this peace deal set a troubling precedent.
If Russia emerges from this war with territorial gains and without severe repercussions, it sends a message to other nations with expansionist ambitions: military aggression can succeed. The absence of meaningful consequences for Russia’s invasion could embolden similar actions worldwide, destabilizing international norms on sovereignty and territorial integrity.
As Trump prepares for potential diplomatic visits and negotiations, the world watches closely. Will his deal-making prowess bring lasting peace, or will it inadvertently reward a regime that used force to redraw borders? The coming weeks will determine whether this historic phone call marks the beginning of peace or sets a dangerous precedent for future conflicts.
