On Friday, President Donald Trump intensified his long-running, mostly one-sided feud with two of America’s most celebrated musicians—Taylor Swift and Bruce Springsteen—via a pair of incendiary posts on his Truth Social platform. Fresh from a whirlwind diplomatic tour of the Middle East, Trump declared Swift “no longer ‘HOT’” and lambasted Springsteen as a “dried out prune” who is “dumb as a rock.” The eruptions underscore the 78-year-old president’s willingness to target cultural icons who have dared to endorse his political opponents and speak out on issues of democracy.
From Endorsements to Enmity: Taylor Swift’s Political Forays
Swift’s Foray into Politics
Taylor Swift, the global pop phenomenon whose Eras Tour shattered attendance records, entered the political arena in 2020 by endorsing then–Vice President Joe Biden. Her decision—announced in an Instagram post to her 80 million followers—marked a rare break from her prior stance of political neutrality. In 2024, Swift again weighed in, endorsing former Vice President Kamala Harris in her presidential campaign against Trump. Swift’s vocal support for Democratic candidates galvanized millions of young voters but also drew the ire of Trump and his supporters.
READ MORE: How the World of Work Has Lured Barbie Out of High Heels
Trump’s Initial Reaction and Ongoing Grudge
Trump’s first public rebuke came via his own social-media channels, where he branded Swift “very ungrateful” and claimed “I hate Taylor Swift” for her political interventions. Despite Swift’s decision to focus on her music and refrain from further public comment on Trump, the president has periodically revived the feud, using it to rally his base and dominate headlines.
“Has anyone noticed that, since I said ‘I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT,’ she’s no longer ‘HOT’?” Trump posted on Truth Social this week, without further elaboration. His comment suggested that Swift’s public image suffered because of her refusal to support him—a claim Swift has never acknowledged. The post immediately trended on X and Instagram, igniting a flurry of memes and recriminations among fans, pundits and fellow celebrities.
Reactions from Fans and Commentators
Within minutes of Trump’s remark, Swifties—Taylor Swift’s devoted fan community—launched #StillHot and #TrumpCantStopUs campaigns across Twitter and TikTok, posting selfies, concert footage and photos of Swift’s recent Vogue cover to demonstrate her enduring cultural cachet. Entertainment columnists lambasted Trump’s fixation, noting that attempting to diminish Swift’s appeal only amplified her visibility and bolstered her status as a symbol of youthful political engagement.
“You can’t erase someone’s influence with a tweet,” noted cultural critic Jemele Hill. “Taylor Swift’s success transcends politics. If anything, this feud highlights that she wields more soft power than the president ever will.”
Turning His Fire on ‘The Boss’: Bruce Springsteen Comes Under Attack
Springsteen’s Call to Action in Manchester
On Monday night in Manchester, England, Bruce Springsteen used his concert platform to deliver an impassioned rallying cry—though he did not name Trump directly. “In my home, the America I love … is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent and treasonous administration,” Springsteen told thousands of fans during his Land of Hope and Dreams Tour. He urged listeners “to rise with us, raise your voices against authoritarianism, and let freedom ring.” His words, carried by international news outlets, quickly reached the Oval Office.
Trump’s Furious Retort
By Friday, Trump had taken aim at Springsteen. “I see that highly overrated Bruce Springsteen goes to a foreign country to speak badly about the President of the United States,” Trump wrote. “Never liked him, never liked his music, or his Radical Left Politics … he’s not a talented guy—just a pushy, obnoxious JERK.”
Trump continued: “If I wasn’t elected, it would have been GONE by now! Sleepy Joe didn’t have a clue … Springsteen is ‘dumb as a rock,’ and couldn’t see what was going on—or could he (which is even worse!)? This dried out ‘prune’ of a rocker … ought to KEEP HIS MOUTH SHUT until he gets back into the Country.”
Political and Cultural Context
Celebrity Endorsements and Electoral Influence
Swift’s and Springsteen’s public statements reflect a broader trend of artists leveraging their platforms for civic engagement. Research shows that high-profile endorsements can drive voter registration and turnout, particularly among young and marginalized demographics. In 2023, Swift’s social-media appeal was credited with helping register over 35,000 new voters in Tennessee alone. Springsteen—often dubbed “The Boss”—has long used his music and speeches to speak on social justice, from the Vietnam era through the Occupy movement.
Trump’s appeal to a populist base rests in part on demonizing liberal elites, including Hollywood figures. Pitting himself against beloved cultural icons allows him to reinforce the narrative that he represents “real America” in opposition to an out-of-touch “coastal elite.”
Labor Union and Industry Responses
The American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada—representing both Swift and Springsteen—issued a joint statement condemning the president’s attacks. “Bruce Springsteen and Taylor Swift are not just brilliant musicians; they are role models and inspirations,” the union said. “Musicians have the right to freedom of expression, and we stand in solidarity with all our members.” The statement emphasized the economic and cultural contributions of the music industry and warned of chilling effects if political figures continue to target artists for their views.
Media and Congressional Reactions
Late-night talk show hosts seized upon the exchanges for material. On The Daily Show, host Trevor Noah quipped, “I didn’t know President Trump was auditioning for American Idol—he sure thinks he knows who’s ‘hot’ or not.” CNN’s media correspondent Brian Stelter described Trump’s rants as “desperate diversions from pressing national issues: the economy, inflation, immigration.”
Some Republican lawmakers, uneasy with Trump’s rhetorical excesses, urged a more restrained tone. Senator Mitt Romney (R-UT) commented, “One’s disagreements with public figures do not justify petty personal attacks. The presidency deserves higher standards.”
Implications for Trump’s Campaign
As Trump touts his reelection bid, these celebrity feuds serve dual purposes: energizing his core supporters and dominating news cycles. Analysts note that by personalizing policy disputes—linking artists to political stances—Trump shifts focus from substantive debates on healthcare, foreign policy and the economy to culture-war flashpoints. Polling suggests this strategy resonates with his base but risks turning off moderate and independent voters who view such attacks as unbecoming.
A Politically Charged Summer Ahead
With the November election looming, the Swift–Trump and Springsteen–Trump battles are likely to intensify. Both artists have indicated no intention to back down: Swift remains focused on her upcoming Eras Tour dates, and Springsteen has announced additional stadium shows in swing states. Their touring schedules will carry their messages into key electoral regions, while Trump’s campaign rallies may feature fresh jabs aimed at reinforcing his narrative of a divided America.
Culture Warriors or Civic Voices?
At the heart of this conflict is a fundamental question about the role of artists in democracy. Critics of celebrity engagement argue that entertainers lack the expertise to weigh in on complex policy questions. Proponents counter that art and politics have always intertwined, from Woody Guthrie’s Dust Bowl ballads to Beyoncé’s anthems of empowerment.
Taylor Swift, who has historically preferred to let her music speak for itself, may find renewed significance as a generational icon whose voice transcends mere entertainment. Bruce Springsteen, in his seventh decade of performing, embodies the notion of lifelong civic duty, using his stage to champion causes he believes in.
Conclusion: A Feud That Reflects a Fractured Nation
Donald Trump’s public sparring with Taylor Swift and Bruce Springsteen may read as tabloid fodder, but it underscores deeper fissures in American public life. When the president of the United States devotes precious real estate on social media to attacking pop stars and rock legends, it reflects both a strategic campaign choice and a reflection of the increasingly polarized cultural landscape.
Swift and Springsteen’s refusal to remain silent—coupled with their union’s wholehearted support—demonstrates that, for many artists, the stage is also a forum for civic participation. Whether their endorsements translate into electoral outcomes remains to be seen. What is clear is that in 2025, music and politics are inseparable, and the riffs between President Trump and America’s megastars may prove among the most memorable in this fraught election year.
