Cuba has long endured a litany of infrastructural and economic challenges. Rolling electricity blackouts, chronic water shortages, unreliable public transportation and surging food prices have become part of daily life for ordinary citizens. In recent years, the government’s efforts to reform the economy—most notably by introducing dual currency stores and dollar-only gasoline stations—have deepened public frustration. After six decades of state socialism and a U.S. embargo that severely restricts foreign currency inflows, Cubans find themselves increasingly dependent on remittances and hard-currency markets just to purchase basic necessities.
Yet amid these hardships, one resource had offered a glimmer of connection to the outside world: the internet. Since 2018, Havana and other major cities saw the rollout of 3G and later 4G networks, enabling mobile data access for the first time. For many Cubans, data plans provided not only news and social media but also small-business platforms and means to communicate with family abroad. With average state wages barely covering essentials, subsidised internet prices—initially as low as 30 CUC (Cuban convertible pesos) per month for up to 10 GB—were a lifeline.
The Trigger: Etecsa’s Sudden Data Tariff Hike
In early June 2025, state-owned telecommunications monopoly Etecsa stunned the nation by sharply increasing mobile data prices with no prior notice. Under the new scheme, a first package of 6 GB remained subsidised at 360 pesos (the official exchange rate equivalent of roughly $1 at black-market rates), but any data beyond that cost 3 360 pesos for just 3 GB—ten times the original rate per gigabyte. The change arrived without warning, immediately igniting outrage across social media and WhatsApp groups nationwide.
Many Cubans reported relying on 10 GB or more each month; under the new tariffs, a typical user’s bill could exceed twice the monthly state salary of 2 100 pesos. For students—already grappling with high living costs and limited income—the increase was devastating. The sudden policy shift crystallised broader grievances about government mismanagement, chronic scarcity of foreign currency and encroaching dollarisation of everyday life.
Student Mobilisation: From Uproar to Organised Action
Within days of the announcement, local chapters of the Federación Estudiantil Universitaria (FEU), Cuba’s historic university student federation, began organising protests and issuing statements of dissent. At the University of Havana’s Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Sciences (Matcom), students declared an attendance strike, demanding transparency from Etecsa and the Ministry of Communications, plus the resignation of FEU leadership for failing to defend student interests.
Similarly, engineering students at the José Antonio Echeverría University of Technology (CUJAE) released a blistering communiqué: “The ultimate responsibility for this crisis lies not with Etecsa technicians but with those who have imposed a chaotic economic model devoid of foresight.” They called for detailed explanations of the decision-making process, including foreign-currency shortfalls, projected revenue losses and any consultations with affected stakeholders.
Across social media, students adopted the slogan “Brave, Revolutionary, Respectful” to brand their action. Small groups demonstrated outside campus gates, wielding hand-painted placards and chanting “¡Internet es un derecho!” (“Internet is a right!”). Though the protests remained peaceful, they represented a rare display of youth dissent in a tightly controlled political environment.
Government Response: Concessions and Countermeasures
Alarmed by the student uprising and its rapid spread, President Miguel Díaz-Canel intervened, addressing the issue on national television. He acknowledged “communication errors” by Etecsa and pledged to meet directly with student representatives. The Ministry of Communications announced a special 2 GB data package at the original subsidised rate exclusively for university students, while committing to revisit the broader pricing structure “in a consultative manner.”
Etecsa President Tania Velázquez appeared on state media to contextualise the hike: “We face an extremely critical situation due to dwindling foreign currency reserves and a significant decline in revenue in recent years.” Yet students and economists alike greeted her remarks with scepticism. Many doubted that additional income from data surcharges would meaningfully alleviate Cuba’s foreign-exchange crisis, instead viewing the move as a regressive tax on the most vulnerable.
To quell further unrest, the government deployed FEU leaders to campuses nationwide, urging a return to classes and promising reforms “within days.” But at CUJAE, engineering students dismissed the measure as “an attempt to silence the student vanguard,” maintaining their strike until full transparency was granted. By week’s end, Matcom had narrowly voted to end its boycott—citing the looming end of the semester and graduation exams—but only after securing a formal meeting with communications officials.
A Deeper Malaise: Dollarisation and Economic Dislocation
While the internet price hike served as the immediate spark, the students’ indignation reflects broader discontent with Cuba’s accelerating shift toward hard currency. Since late 2023, state-run supermarkets have opened that accept only U.S. dollars or euros. Gas stations have similarly begun pricing fuel in dollars, with rumours that electricity bills will follow suit. Each new measure effectively forces Cubans to appeal to relatives abroad for remittances in hard currency, bypassing the weakening national peso and fuelling social inequality.
“The internet was the straw that broke the camel’s back,” said Ana Morales, a third-year engineering student. “We’ve survived blackouts and empty store shelves, but now they’re forcing us into the dollar economy. It’s not socialism; it’s a racket.” Her sentiment resonated across campus gatherings, where students cited revolutionary slogans—“Patria o Muerte” (“Homeland or Death”) and “Revolución es cambiar todo lo que debe ser cambiado”—to argue that current policies betray Fidel Castro’s ideals.
Historical Role of the FEU: From Revolutionary Vanguard to Dormant Bureaucracy
Founded in 1922, the Federación Estudiantil Universitaria once spearheaded mass protests against pre-revolutionary dictatorships and played a decisive role in the 1952 student uprising against Fulgencio Batista. After 1959, however, the FEU became a co-opted arm of the one-party state, its leadership appointed by the Communist Youth. For decades, independent student activism was virtually nonexistent.
The recent protests mark the broadest student revolt since university autonomy was curtailed in the early 1960s. As Michael Bustamante, Chair of Cuban Studies at the University of Miami, observed: “I don’t recall any comparable pushback on a government measure of this scale by students since the revolution.” Even conservative commentators in Miami found themselves unprepared to categorise the movement within traditional left-right paradigms, as the protesters invoked revolutionary rhetoric against their own government’s turn away from egalitarian principles.
Potential Consequences and Risks
For Cuban students, the stakes are high. Any “transgression” against state policy can carry lifelong repercussions: delayed graduation, professional blacklisting or even expulsion from university. Many participants spoke of existential dilemmas—balancing civic duty with the pragmatic need to complete their studies and secure employment. “I support my daughter,” said one nervous mother of a psychology student. “But I fear for her future if she can’t graduate.”
Despite such risks, the movement’s momentum suggests a new generation of Cubans is unwilling to remain silent. “We’ve awakened something historic,” said an anonymous Matcom student. “We’ve gained confidence and organization for everything that troubles us in the future.”
Looking Forward: Will the Government Back Down?
In response to mounting pressure, President Díaz-Canel has convened a high-level commission to review Etecsa’s pricing model, pledging a “full audit” and potential rollback of data tariffs. Yet many analysts view these as stopgap measures, unlikely to resolve Cuba’s deeper economic dysfunction. Without meaningful structural reforms—such as equitable distribution of foreign currency, real wage increases and restoration of peso-based services—new crises will almost certainly follow.
For now, students remain vigilant. Some chapters of the FEU have called for a second nationwide strike if promised meetings fail to yield substantive outcomes. Others are drafting proposals for a transparent, participatory approach to policymaking—an unheard-of step in Cuba’s top-down political culture.
Conclusion: A Turning Point for Cuba’s Youth
Cuba’s recent student mobilization over internet prices represents more than a campaign for affordable data. It embodies a profound revolt against creeping dollarisation, economic mismanagement and the erosion of revolutionary ideals. For the first time in decades, young Cubans are once again claiming the legacy of the 1950s student vanguard, demanding to be heard on matters that shape their daily lives and futures.
Whether the government will heed these calls remains uncertain. What is clear, however, is that Cuba’s youth have discovered newfound agency—and may no longer accept policies imposed without consultation. In a country where every peso and every kilowatt of power is hard-won, the data plan revolt may have opened the door to a broader reckoning with the island’s socialist experiment.
READ MORE: Japanese Private Lander “Resilience” Likely Crashes in Second Moon Landing Attempt
