In a remarkable demonstration of cognitive sophistication, common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) have been shown to delay gratification in a manner akin to the famous Stanford “marshmallow test” for children. A 2021 study led by behavioral ecologist Dr. Alexandra Schnell at the University of Cambridge adapted the classic experiment for cephalopods, revealing that these soft-bodied invertebrates can learn to wait for a more desirable reward rather than settle for an immediately available—but less preferred—option.
Why Cephalopods? Challenging Assumptions About Animal Intelligence
For decades, the marshmallow test has served as a simple measure of impulse control and future planning in human development. Children are offered a single marshmallow and told that if they can resist eating it for fifteen minutes, they will receive a second treat. The ability to delay gratification correlates with academic success, social competence, and emotional regulation later in life.
Translating this paradigm to nonhuman species requires ingenuity: researchers must establish that animals understand the contingencies of waiting for a better reward. Previous work demonstrated that some primates, dogs, and corvids can exhibit inconsistent delay behavior. In 2020, one version of the test suggested cuttlefish might refrain from devouring a morning meal of crab meat when they anticipated a tastier shrimp dinner. However, distinguishing true self-control from simple learned feeding patterns demanded a more rigorous design.
Experimental Design: Symbols, Delays, and Live Prey
Training Phase: Symbol Recognition
Six common cuttlefish were trained to associate three distinct symbols with different outcomes:
- Circle: Immediate access to the food reward.
- Triangle: Access after a variable delay of 10 to 130 seconds.
- Square: No access (used only in control trials).
Over multiple sessions, the animals learned that approaching one door or another would lead to the corresponding symbol’s outcome. This phase ensured that cuttlefish understood the link between each symbol, the delay interval, and the reward availability.
Test Phase: Choosing Between Prawn and Shrimp
In the critical test condition, cuttlefish faced two transparent chambers: one containing a single piece of raw king prawn (their less-preferred food) behind an open (circle-marked) door, and the other housing a live grass shrimp (highly preferred) behind a triangle-marked door programmed to open only after the delay. If a cuttlefish attempted the prawn, the shrimp was immediately removed—eliminating any chance of receiving the preferred reward.
In the control condition, the shrimp remained inaccessible, locked behind the square-marked door, while the prawn was freely available. This controlled for the possibility that cuttlefish would simply wait when no better reward was truly attainable.
Cognitive Flexibility Assessment
After completing the delay-of-gratification trials, the same six cuttlefish underwent a reversal learning task. They were shown two visual cues (grey square versus white square). Choosing the rewarded cue yielded a snack; once criterion performance was reached, the reward contingencies were flipped, requiring the animals to suppress the previously correct response and adapt to the new rule. This measured cognitive flexibility—a trait often linked to executive control and self-regulation.
Results: Waiting, Learning, and Individual Differences
Universal Patience for a Better Meal
All six cuttlefish in the test condition consistently bypassed the immediately available prawn and waited for the delayed shrimp reward. They tolerated delays ranging from 50 to 130 seconds—durations comparable to those observed in large-brained vertebrates such as chimpanzees, crows, and parrots. In contrast, in the control trials where the shrimp was unobtainable, the cuttlefish rapidly consumed the prawn, confirming that their patience was motivated by genuine expectation of superior food rather than mere avoidance of a locked chamber.
Flexibility Correlates with Impulse Control
The reversal learning task revealed notable individual differences: cuttlefish that adapted most swiftly to the changed reward contingencies (i.e., displayed the fewest perseverative errors) were also the ones who waited longest in the delay trials. This correlation suggests a link between inhibitory control (forgoing an immediate reward) and cognitive flexibility (updating choices when rules change), reinforcing the idea that cuttlefish possess executive functions previously thought restricted to vertebrates.
Ecological Roots of Self-Control
Cuttlefish do not use tools, stash food, or form complex social hierarchies—behaviors commonly associated with delay of gratification in other taxa. So why should they exhibit such self-control? Schnell and colleagues propose that the cuttlefish’s ambush-predatory lifestyle offers a clue:
- Camouflage and Patience: Cuttlefish spend extended periods motionless on the seafloor, relying on their sophisticated skin-patterning abilities to blend seamlessly into substrates while awaiting prey. Abandoning camouflage to pursue a low-value snack increases predation risk.
- Prey Selection: In the wild, cuttlefish forage opportunistically—first targeting easier, smaller prey, then switching to larger, more energy-rich items when available. Exercising restraint in the lab may mirror their natural tendency to forgo suboptimal meals when superior options exist.
Dr. Schnell noted, “Delayed gratification may have evolved as a byproduct of a strategic foraging approach: maximize energy intake while minimizing exposure to predators by waiting for the most nutritious prey.”
Broader Implications for Comparative Cognition
Rethinking the Evolution of Intelligence
These findings challenge the long-held assumption that advanced cognitive skills—such as future planning and impulse control—are confined to mammals and birds with large, highly folded brains. The cuttlefish’s neural architecture is radically different: their central brain houses approximately half a billion neurons, many distributed in their arms, and organized in lobes distinct from vertebrate cortex. Yet they achieve comparable behavioral outcomes.
Convergent Cognitive Strategies
The cuttlefish marshmallow test joins a growing body of evidence for convergent evolution of intelligence across distant lineages. Corvids, octopuses, and now cuttlefish reveal that diverse ecological pressures can sculpt complex problem-solving abilities in bodies of strikingly different design.
Future Directions: Probing Episodic Memory and Planning
While cuttlefish have demonstrated “episodic-like” memory—recalling what-where-when information—and even forming false memories, the next frontier is to ascertain whether they engage in prospective cognition: mentally simulating future scenarios to guide present actions.
Potential avenues include:
- Tool-Use Simulations: Testing whether cuttlefish can anticipate the future utility of objects, despite lacking true tools.
- Multi-Stage Delays: Extending delay intervals to several minutes or hours to gauge temporal horizons.
- Contextual Shifts: Introducing environmental changes (e.g., daylight versus night cycles) to evaluate flexibility in planning under varying risk levels.
Dr. Schnell emphasizes, “Demonstrating genuine future planning would deepen our appreciation for cephalopod minds and inform our understanding of how intelligence emerges across the animal kingdom.”
Conclusion: A Call to Respect Invertebrate Minds
The cuttlefish delay-of-gratification study underscores the perils of underestimating animal intelligence, particularly among invertebrates. By mastering a task once thought exclusive to human children—and shared only with a handful of “large-brained” vertebrates—cuttlefish challenge us to broaden our definitions of cognition and to recognize the rich mental lives of even the most alien-seeming creatures.
As we continue to explore the depths of cephalopod neurology and behavior, one lesson stands clear: intelligence is not the sole province of mammals and birds. It flourishes wherever ecological demands favor flexibility, patience, and innovation—even in a tank, waiting for a shrimp.
READ MORE: Strange Flashing Object Discovered in Deep Space Puzzles Astronomers
