Tech giants, including Meta, have raised concerns over the Australian government’s approach to implementing its under-16 social media ban, criticizing what they call a lack of transparency in the decision-making process. The criticism comes as US President Donald Trump threatens retaliatory measures against countries imposing restrictions on American digital platforms.
Tech Giants Accuse Government of Secretive Planning
Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has accused Communications Minister Michelle Rowland of formulating the details of the proposed age restriction in secrecy. The company stated that the government is conducting a “closed-door consultation” to determine which platforms will be covered under the new law, contradicting earlier commitments to engage in public discussions.
READ MORE: Whyalla Steelworks Losing $1.5 Million Per Day Before Administration, KordaMentha Says
“This goes against commitments the government made to parents, safety organizations, and technology platforms that they would undertake public consultation,” Meta said in a statement.
TikTok echoed these concerns, highlighting what it described as inconsistencies in the government’s policy exemptions. “The similarity of these three platforms (TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube) underscores the inconsistency of the government’s proposed exemption… It would be akin to banning the sale of soft drinks to minors but exempting Coca-Cola,” the company stated.
Political and Trade Implications of the Ban
The debate over the social media ban has been further complicated by Trump’s recent memorandum titled “Prevent the Unfair Exploitation of American Innovation.” Issued on February 21, the memo threatens tariffs and other economic penalties against countries imposing new regulations, fines, or taxes on US tech firms.
Although Trump’s directive does not specifically mention Australia’s under-16 social media ban, it signals a potential risk for the Albanese government, which is already navigating trade negotiations with the US. The government recently slowed its efforts to impose a digital services levy on tech giants like Meta and Google while attempting to secure exemptions from Trump’s proposed steel tariffs.
Despite concerns over possible economic fallout, Labor sources remain confident that the social media restrictions will not provoke direct US retaliation. “We don’t believe the US would punish Australia over an age-gating policy aimed at protecting children,” a senior government official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Scope of the Ban and Industry Reactions
The federal government has yet to clarify key details of the proposed restrictions, including enforcement mechanisms and penalties for non-compliance. Labor has so far indicated that gaming apps, health services, and educational platforms will be exempt from the ban. However, companies such as Meta, Snap, and TikTok have expressed frustration that YouTube appears to have secured a carve-out, despite offering content similar to their platforms.
Meta’s representatives argue that the government’s approach lacks consistency and fairness. They have also questioned the effectiveness of the policy, pointing out that many young users could circumvent age restrictions through VPNs or fake accounts.
Critics of the policy have also raised concerns about potential unintended consequences. “Banning under-16s from social media could push them towards less regulated online spaces where they may face even greater risks,” said Chris Wright from Sydney University’s Business School. “A blanket ban does not address the real challenge of online safety.”
Labor’s Justification and Future Amendments
The Labor government has defended its approach, emphasizing that the policy is part of a broader effort to make social media safer for young Australians. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has framed the proposal as a necessary response to growing concerns about cyberbullying, mental health issues, and online predators.
A spokesperson for Minister Rowland acknowledged industry concerns but maintained that the policy is still under development and could be adjusted based on public feedback. “This is novel reform, and we are committed to ensuring this legislation keeps pace with a rapidly evolving social and digital ecosystem,” the spokesperson said. “If community sentiment changes over time, we will review the policy at the two-year mark.”
Broader Impact on Australia’s Tech Agenda
The social media ban is one of several digital policies pursued by the Albanese government, many of which align more closely with US Democratic priorities than Trump’s stance on technology regulation. Other initiatives include new digital scamming laws, local content quotas for US streaming platforms, and efforts to curb online misinformation.
However, tensions between Australia’s regulatory goals and the US government’s position could lead to friction in the coming months. The US digital economy is significantly larger than Australia’s, and Trump’s administration has made clear that it views international tech regulations as a potential threat to American interests.
Conclusion
As the Australian government moves forward with its under-16 social media ban, it faces mounting pressure from both the tech industry and global trade considerations. While Labor remains committed to its policy, questions remain about its implementation, effectiveness, and the broader implications for Australia’s relationship with the US tech sector.
With ongoing industry backlash and international trade concerns looming, the next few months will be critical in shaping the future of social media regulation in Australia. Whether the government will modify its approach in response to industry pushback or US pressure remains to be seen.
