Millions of Australian Workers to Receive 3.5% Pay Rise Following Fair Work Commission Ruling

On June 3, 2025, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) delivered its annual decision on the national minimum wage and award wage rates, granting a 3.5 percent increase to both. Effective July 1, 2025, this adjustment raises the national minimum wage to $24.95 per hour (or $948 per week based on a 38-hour work week). For millions of low-paid and award-dependent workers, this equates to approximately $32 extra per week, or nearly $1,670 per year. The decision comes as inflation has settled back within the Reserve Bank of Australia’s 2–3 percent target range and follows five consecutive years of real wage declines for award-wage earners.

Background to the Annual Wage Review
Every year, the Fair Work Commission conducts a thorough review of the national minimum wage and modern award rates. Its mandate is set by the Fair Work Act 2009, which instructs the panel to consider:

• The economic context (including inflation and unemployment)
• The needs of low-paid workers
• Industry competitiveness and productivity
• The capacity of businesses to pay higher wages

Since mid‐2021, rising consumer prices outpaced modest annual wage increases, causing the real value of award-level pay to erode. In the last two years alone, inflation has averaged 2.4 percent per annum, while wage increases often fell short of that mark. By December 2024, the real value of minimum and award wages had dropped by 4.5 percent relative to inflation. Critics warn that continued wage suppression would “embed poverty” for workers on the lowest rungs of the pay scale.

Scope of Impact: Who Benefits?
While the national minimum wage—a catch-all floor for non-award employees—covers around 3 percent of the labour force, roughly one-fifth of all Australian workers are paid according to modern awards. These award rates apply to occupations ranging from retail and hospitality to healthcare, aged care, child care, security services, and administrative support.

Key statistics on award-dependent workers:

• Approximately 20 percent of all employees receive award-based wages.
• More than half of award workers are casual employees.
• Two-thirds of award servants work part-time hours.
• Over 35 percent of award earners are female.
• Award wages account for about 10.5 percent of the total national “wage bill.”

Industry concentrations:

• Accommodation and food services employ many award workers, particularly in hospitality roles such as kitchen hands, wait staff, and baristas.
• Health care and social assistance sectors rely on award entitlements for aged-care workers, personal carers, and community services staff.
• Retail trade employs sales assistants, checkout operators, and store assistants under award conditions.
• Administrative and support services employ security guards, cleaners, and clerical workers under relevant awards.

For those on award wages, the FWC’s decision means an across-the-board hourly uplift. For example:

• A level 5 security guard in regional Victoria (earning around $22.50 per hour prior to July 1) will see a roughly $1.00 hourly boost, which Coach William Seamons describes as “awesome” and “overdue,” noting it will make a tangible difference to him and his family’s weekly budget.
• A casual café barista working 25 hours a week will receive an extra $1–$1.20 per hour (depending on allowance loadings), translating into an additional $25–$30 weekly income—critical for those living with tight margins.

Why 3.5 Percent? Balancing Competing Pressures
The Fair Work Commission’s decision to award a 3.5 percent pay rise fell between calls from various stakeholders:

• The federal government sought an “economically sustainable real wage increase,” explicitly encouraging the FWC to restore some of the purchasing power lost since 2021, but without prescribing a specific figure. Minister for Employment Amanda Rishworth welcomed the result, noting, “It represents a real wage increase to close to 3 million workers across the country—almost $1,700 extra per annum for full-time minimum wage earners.”
• Business lobby groups (including the Australian Retailers Association and the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry) had recommended a maximum uplift of 2.5 percent to avoid placing undue cost pressure on businesses, especially small enterprises operating on razor-thin profit margins and contending with rising energy, rental, insurance, and supply-chain costs. The Australian Industry Group suggested a 2.6 percent increase.
• The Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) argued for a 4.5 percent raise, aiming to more rapidly restore real wages to pre-inflation levels. ACTU Secretary Sally McManus called the 3.5 percent outcome a “great result,” pointing out, “It’s 1.1 percent above inflation, marking the first real wage rise for the lowest-paid Australians this cycle.”

FWC President Justice Adam Ramsay noted that with inflation now within the RBA’s 2–3 percent target, the Commission had a “responsibility to ensure that the lowest-paid are not permanently locked into disadvantaged purchasing power.” Over the last three decisions, the FWC “prioritized macroeconomic stability” by avoiding above-inflation adjustments. Now that inflation has moderated, the panel considered it the “opportune moment to commence unwinding that real wage loss.”

Economic Context: Inflation, Productivity, and Wage Growth
At 2.4 percent annual inflation (April 2025), consumer prices have cooled from the 7 percent peaks recorded during the global supply-chain disruptions of 2021–2022. Low inflation creates space for modest wage increases without reigniting price pressures. The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has kept the cash rate steady at 4.10 percent since November 2024, signaling a belief that the inflation-outlook remains contained.

However, overall wage growth in Australia has been sluggish. The Wage Price Index (WPI) increased by 2.9 percent over the year to March 2025, lagging behind CPI. This divergence underscores the ongoing “real wages decline” faced by casual, part-time, and award-based workers.

Western economists point to a broader productivity challenge: output per hour worked has barely budged since mid-2023. The FWC’s annual review explicitly stated, “Persistently low productivity—coupled with the higher wage growth in the Enterprise Bargaining sector—means that allowing award wages to rise faster than productivity could threaten employment.”

Yet, as Justice Ramsay noted, “Failure to adjust award wages when inflation is low risks permanently embedding lower living standards for award workers.” Universities and think tanks, including the Grattan Institute, have warned that prolonged erosion of low-wage incomes amplifies financial stress, particularly among workers who rely on superannuation or make minimal withdrawals. The FWC’s middle road—neither fully restoring lost purchasing power nor entirely deferring action—reflects the desire to strike a balance between worker welfare and macroeconomic stability.

Reactions Across Stakeholder Groups

1. Government Response
   Employment Minister Amanda Rishworth praised the decision as “consistent with the government’s submission to the FWC,” emphasizing the impact on close to three million award and minimum wage workers. She reiterated the government’s view that “wages should grow in line with or slightly above inflation when the economy allows it,” aiming to shore up household incomes without stoking renewed inflation.
2. Business Community
   • Small Business Sector: The Council of Small Business Organisations Australia (COSBOA) decried the 3.5 percent rise as a “shock” to small firms already grappling with high rent, energy bills, and insurance premiums. COSBOA CEO Luke Achterstraat warned: “For every $1 increase in the wage floor, employers face proportionally higher workers’ compensation, payroll tax, and the looming superannuation guarantee hike to 12 percent from July 1. Many small businesses will feel the pinch.”
   • Large Employers and Industry Groups: The Australian Retailers Association cautioned that the award increase could prompt further price rises in retail and hospitality, given that labour costs can account for up to 30 percent of total operating expenses. The Australian Chamber agreed, urging macro policymakers to “monitor any second-round inflation effects.”
3. Unions and Worker Advocates
   The ACTU hailed the 3.5 percent uplift as a “landmark moment for low-wage Australians,” noting that “for too long, award workers have watched their real wages evaporate.” Unions pointed out that the outcome would help close the widening income gap between award workers and those covered by enterprise agreements, which have seen nominal wage growth of around 4.5 percent in 2024–25.
4. Economists and Academic Analysts
   • University of Sydney Business School: Professor John Buchanan called the result “disappointing but predictable.” He argued that the FWC “took a modest step to restore real wages without entirely reversing the deterioration experienced since 2021.” He acknowledged that “in the absence of productivity gains, wage increases beyond 3 percent risk further job displacement.”
   • Westpac Economics: Senior Economist Justin Smirk affirmed Westpac’s forecast of wage inflation at 3.4 percent mid-year, tapering to 3.1 percent by December. He wrote: “Weak labour demand will dampen wage growth from negotiated agreements, while the award minimum hike sustains headline wage inflation at around 3.5 percent.”

Case Studies: Real-World Impacts on Award Workers

1. Hospitality and Retail
   • Café Barista (Casual, Sydney): On an award rate of $23.50 per hour pre-July 1, the barista stands to receive roughly $1.10 extra per hour in base pay. Over 25 casual hours weekly, this lifts weekly earnings by $27.50 before penalty and weekend loading, vital for managing living costs and rent in an expensive city.
   • Retail Store Assistant (Part-time, Melbourne): From a previous $23.30 per hour to $24.10, a 20 hour per week schedule means around $16 extra weekly (pre-tax)—enough, the worker says, to cover grocery inflation and student loan repayments.
2. Health Care and Social Assistance
   • Aged-Care Worker (Level 3, Part-time, Brisbane): Working 30 hours, the care assistant’s current rate ($23.15 per hour) increases to $23.95. She estimates an extra $24 weekly, easing pressure on her household where two incomes barely cover mortgage and medical costs.
   • Home-Care Carer (Full-time, Regional VIC): Earning $22.65 per hour under the Social, Community, Home Care, and Disability Services Industry Award, the worker’s 38 hour week jumps by $13.30 weekly to $952 per week. She describes the rise as “a relief,” given rising petrol and utility bills.
3. Security Services
   • Security Guard (Level 5 full-time, Regional VIC): Base rate climbs from $22.30 to $23.30 per hour. On 38 hours, this yields an extra $38 weekly—enough to buy groceries for his family of five or assist with his child’s school fees.
4. Education and Childcare
   • Early Childhood Educator (Diploma-certified, Part-time, Perth): With a wage rise from $25.10 to $25.95 per hour, a typical 30 hour week yields $25 extra, offsetting looming childcare costs for her own children.

These scenarios highlight that award-based workers—often juggling multiple part-time roles—will find immediate, tangible relief from the 3.5 percent uplift.

Implications for the Superannuation Guarantee
The FWC increase coincides with another change: from July 1, 2025, the Superannuation Guarantee (SG) will rise from 11 percent to 12 percent of ordinary time earnings. For minimum wage earners on $948 per week, the employer must now contribute an additional $9.48 weekly—on top of the 3.5 percent wage rise.

Critics argue these stacked increases could strain small businesses further. Yet, proponents stress that extra SG contributions accrue in workers’ super balances, helping them prepare for retirement. The Grattan Institute reported that low-paid workers often maintain super balances into retirement well above required minimum drawdown rates, reflecting a reluctance to spend super due to financial insecurity. The combined wage and SG boosts might help some workers feel more financially secure sooner.

Outlook: Will Productivity Catch Up?
A longstanding debate concerns the relationship between productivity growth and wage growth. In Australia, labour productivity (GDP per hour worked) barely budged during 2024–25. If output per worker remains stagnant, businesses fear further wage hikes will compress profit margins, potentially leading to cost-cutting or slowed hiring.

University of Melbourne economist Professor Helen White notes, “Without a corresponding lift in productivity, real wages at the bottom end can only be sustained if firms are willing to accept slimmer margins or pass costs onto consumers.” She adds, “However, low household savings and elevated living costs heighten consumer price sensitivity, so businesses can’t easily raise prices without losing customers.”

The Federal Treasury has launched initiatives—including tax incentives for R&D and infrastructure investments—aimed at boosting productivity in the medium term. Optimists argue that the 3.5 percent increase will stimulate consumer spending among low-income households, potentially boosting aggregate demand and spurring business investment. Skeptics warn that without structural reforms in training, technology adoption, and competitive markets, productivity will remain muted.

Looking Ahead: Future Wage Reviews
The Fair Work Commission is slated to commence its 2026 wage review in early 2026, with a decision due by July 1, 2026. Key questions loom:

• Inflation’s trajectory: If inflation remains around 2 percent, will the FWC continue awarding “above inflation” adjustments to make further inroads into real wage loss?
• Labour market dynamics: Should employment weaken significantly (e.g., unemployment rises above 5 percent), will the FWC moderate wage increases to avoid pushing rates too high for employers?
• Enterprise Bargaining vs. Awards: Many unionized sectors have secured enterprise agreement (EA) increases of roughly 4–5 percent in 2024–25. If EAs outpace awards significantly, pressure may mount for the FWC to “narrow the gap” between EA and award wage growth.
• Sectoral pressures: Certain industries—health care, aged care, social assistance—face ongoing labour shortages. In these sectors, award increases alone may not address recruitment challenges, requiring additional funding or government intervention.

Conclusion: A Step Toward Restoring Fair Wages
The Fair Work Commission’s 3.5 percent wage uplift represents a calculated effort to begin reversing the real wage declines experienced by award-dependent workers since mid-2021. While business groups warn of heightened cost pressures, unions and worker advocates celebrate the decision as a long-overdue restoration of purchasing power for the lowest-paid Australians.

By mid-2025, roughly three million Australians—spanning casual café baristas, part-time retail assistants, aged care workers, and security guards—will benefit from an immediate pay boost. For many, that extra $32 per week or $1,670 per year can mean the difference between keeping up with rent and falling behind.

As inflation remains subdued within the RBA’s target range, the FWC has seized the opportunity to ensure that award wages do not remain permanently entrenched below pre-pandemic living standards. The mid-point 3.5 percent decision strikes a compromise: helpful for workers yet mindful of businesses’ capacity to pay, especially in a momentum-constrained economy.

The real test lies ahead: whether these additional wages will translate into stronger consumer spending, whether businesses will respond by boosting productivity or raising prices, and whether subsequent FWC reviews will see wage gains consolidated or deferred. For now, millions of workers can breathe easier knowing that from July 1, 2025, their minimum and award rates finally begin to catch up with the rising cost of living.

READ MORE: Australians Give Super Funds a Social Licence to Operate