Donald Trump and Elon Musk have ignited a public feud just days after Musk’s departure from a White House advisory role. The dispute centers on Trump’s sweeping legislative package—dubbed the “big, beautiful bill”—which aims to raise the U.S. debt ceiling while enacting extensive tax cuts and trimming federal spending. Musk, one of the largest Republican donors and a recent member of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), publicly denounced the legislation on social media. Trump, visibly disappointed by Musk’s reversal, fired back during a press conference at the White House, accusing the Tesla and SpaceX CEO of ingratitude and of opposing cuts to electric vehicle (EV) tax credits.
Background: The “Big, Beautiful Bill” Explained
Purpose and Scope
Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” seeks to address several urgent fiscal and economic challenges:
- Raising the Debt Ceiling: Congress must authorize an increase in the debt limit to prevent a U.S. government default. The legislation proposes lifting the ceiling through 2026.
- Tax Cuts: The bill includes broad provisions to reduce corporate and individual income taxes, with the stated goal of stimulating economic growth and job creation.
- Spending Reductions: To offset new deficits created by tax cuts, the package proposes scaling back certain federal programs—most notably, Medicaid benefits for low‐income Americans.
Major Components
- Individual Income Tax Reductions: A temporary lowering of marginal income tax rates across several brackets for taxable years 2025–2027.
- Corporate Rate Changes: A permanent cut in the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 18 percent, with additional incentives for domestic manufacturing and energy production.
- Medicaid Work Requirements: Stricter eligibility criteria for able‐bodied adults without dependents to participate in Medicaid, with exemptions for pregnant women and medical hardship.
- Electric Vehicle Tax Credits: Phasing out or capping the existing federal tax credits of up to $7,500 per new purchase to reduce federal outlays, while introducing targeted incentives for domestic battery manufacturing.
Congressional Passage and Initial Reception
In the House of Representatives, the bill passed with a narrow margin, relying almost exclusively on Republican votes. Speaker Mike Johnson hailed it as “an essential measure to protect Social Security and Medicare and to unleash American enterprise by letting taxpayers keep more of their own money.” However, the legislation’s fate in the Senate was uncertain: Democrats signaled staunch opposition to both the debt‐ceiling increase and deep cuts to Medicaid, while a handful of moderate Republicans voiced concerns about losing EV credits and the potential harm to financially vulnerable populations.
Elon Musk’s Withdrawal and Public Criticism
Musk’s White House Role and Departure
Last month, Elon Musk assumed the title of Special Advisor for Innovation and Efficiency as part of DOGE, a newly created office aimed at identifying government waste and streamlining interagency coordination. Although his role was largely symbolic—lacking formal authority to enact policy changes—Musk’s presence lent prestige to Trump’s administrative agenda.
On May 29, Musk announced in a Twitter/X post that he was stepping away from his White House role, citing business obligations and a desire to focus on his companies. At the time, both Trump and Musk spoke warmly of each other: Trump praised Musk’s “brilliant mind,” and Musk expressed gratitude for “the opportunity to help bring efficient, American‐first solutions to government.”
Musk’s Tweet Denouncing the Bill
Just days after leaving his advisory post, Musk took to X (formerly Twitter) to lambaste the “slim beautiful bill” as a “disgusting abomination” that would saddle American citizens “with crushingly unsustainable debt.” He criticized the size of the legislation—reportedly encompassing more than 1,500 pages—and objected to provisions that curtailed federal EV incentives. Musk suggested that any tax relief for middle‐income earners ought to come without benefits for legacy industries, describing the bill as rife with “wasteful pork” earmarks.
Musk’s tweet garnered immediate attention, prompting thousands of replies from both critics and supporters. Some praised his willingness to break from party orthodoxy, while others accused him of hypocrisy: having previously enjoyed generous subsidies for producing EVs, his opposition to tax credits unnerved many environmental advocates.
Trump’s Response: Public Reprimand and Accusations
Press Conference Remarks
Amid pressure to secure Senate support, President Trump convened a press conference at the White House on June 4. When asked about Musk’s social media comments, Trump paused before addressing the former advisor. “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore,” Trump said in a measured yet pointed tone. “He said the most beautiful things about me when he joined the administration; now he’s saying I’m foolish. I’m very disappointed in Elon. I’ve helped Elon a lot.”
Trump then pivoted to explain why, in his view, Musk turned against the legislation:
- Electric Vehicle Tax Credit Rollback: “Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody in this room. He didn’t have a problem with it until he realized we were cutting the EV tax credits—billions and billions of dollars that used to go out the door. He flipped on it the second he saw that.”
- Alleged Ingratitude: Trump added, “He’s not the first. When people leave my administration, some of them miss it so badly that they either want back in or they turn hostile. I’m not surprised, but I am disappointed.”
Trump concluded by reiterating his faith in the bill’s merits: “This is the only way to keep Social Security and Medicare afloat, to lower taxes for hardworking Americans, and to get our national debt under control. If Elon wants to oppose that, that’s his prerogative. But he will be judged for it.”
Musk’s Counter‐Punch: “Slim Beautiful Bill for the Win”
Within minutes of Trump’s remarks, Musk posted a new series of messages on X, affirming his opposition and demanding deeper cuts to government spending.
- Reposting Trump’s 2013 Debt Ceiling Critique: Musk resurfaced a tweet from Trump’s 2013 remarks about being “embarrassed” that Republicans were raising the debt ceiling. Musk wrote, “Wise words from the man himself. Why raise the debt ceiling now if you opposed it before?”
- Accusation of “Ingratitude”: Musk taunted Trump, claiming that without his support in 2020, “Trump would have lost the election, Democrats would control the House, and Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.”
- Demand for Pork Elimination: “I’d be okay with cuts to EV credits if Congress purges this ‘slimy mountain of disgusting pork’—wasteful spending disguising itself as legislative necessity. Enough is enough.”
These posts once again sparked debate online. Some users echoed Musk’s call for “no bailouts” and more aggressive fiscal belt‐tightening, while others accused him of betraying the GOP and undermining a key priority—protecting EV subsidies—to curry favor with his commercial interests.
Senate Uncertainty and Partisan Responses
Democratic Opposition
Democrats have long opposed the “big, beautiful bill” on ideological grounds. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) labeled it “a cruel betrayal” of low‐income families, warning that cuts to Medicaid would lead to “worse health outcomes, higher emergency room bills, and more preventable deaths.” Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) criticized the legislation for favoring corporate tax breaks over investments in public education and infrastructure. In her floor speech, she declared, “This bill is not budget repair; it is budget wrecking. Donald Trump and his allies have chosen tax cuts for the wealthy over care for the elderly, the sick, and our children.”
Schumer also seized on Musk’s dissent to underscore GOP division. “When one of your biggest Republican megadonors is telling you that you’re mortgaging America’s future, maybe it’s time to come up with a better plan,” Schumer quipped.
Republican Moderates Weigh In
A handful of Senate Republicans—particularly those representing swing states—have voiced skepticism. Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) praised Musk’s fiscal frugality argument, stating, “We must scrutinize every line item. If EV incentives are to be trimmed, let’s broaden our focus to eliminate truly unnecessary spending.” Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) went further: “If we’re going to lower taxes, we ought to do so responsibly. That means no more giveaways to pet projects that have nothing to do with national defense or economic competitiveness.”
However, other Republicans rebuked Musk. Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY), majority leader until recently, dismissed the Tesla CEO’s critique as “novel for someone who has benefitted from multiple multibillion‐dollar subsidies.” McConnell pointed to prior rounds of EV tax credits and Department of Energy loan guarantees awarded to Musk’s companies and said, “If Elon wants a smaller government, he can start by returning those loans.”
Trump Campaign Supporters
Many voices on the right rallied to Trump’s defense. Leading conservative commentator Sean Hannity dubbed Musk’s tweet “backstabbing” and encouraged listeners to “remember Elon’s largesse when he was fawning over his boss.” Former White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany wrote, “Anybody who cuts off the hand that fed them ends up paying the price.” Several MAGA supporters demanded Musk refund all political donations to the GOP for perceived disloyalty.
Industry and Economic Stakeholders Respond
Automotive and Renewable Energy Lobbies
Business groups representing the auto industry and clean energy sector weighed in cautiously. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an industry group representing Tesla’s traditional rivals, praised Musk’s candor. “We need tax policy that supports American jobs in auto manufacturing and battery production,” said President John Bozzella. “If that means rethinking the size and scope of the bill, let’s do it in a transparent, bipartisan manner.”
The Advanced Energy Economy coalition—a trade association representing solar, wind, and EV charging infrastructure companies—urged Congress to preserve at least a portion of EV incentives. “Tax credits have a track record of driving private investment into clean technology,” said spokeswoman Leah Louis‐Paul. “Eliminating them entirely will set back U.S. leadership in the global EV race.” The group added that any reduction in EV credits should be balanced by incentives for domestic battery manufacturing and charging network expansion.
Fiscal Watchdogs and Think Tanks
Nonprofit policy organizations offered mixed analyses. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) chastised Trump for pushing through deep tax cuts without commensurate revenue offsets. “This legislation will swell deficits to levels not seen since World War II,” warned CRFB Director Danielle Goldfarb. “True conservatives who care about budgetary sanity should join Musk in demanding that Congress remove wasteful spending.”
Conversely, the American Energy Alliance (AEA), a pro‐fossil fuel think tank, backed Trump’s cuts as “critical to reducing regulatory burdens.” AEA President Thomas Pyle observed, “We need to unlock domestic energy potential. Cutting taxes and deregulating encourages greater domestic production, reducing reliance on hostile foreign suppliers.” Pyle, however, noted that if EV credits were removed, “Congress should also scrap any lingering barriers to expanding oil and gas drilling on federal lands.”
Public Opinion and Polling
Inexplicable Misdirection or Genuine Policy Dispute?
Early polling suggests that the wider public is split along partisan lines. A CNN‐SSRS survey conducted June 3–4 found that 47 percent of registered voters oppose the “big, beautiful bill” overall, while 43 percent support it; 10 percent remain undecided. Among those expressing an opinion, 62 percent of Democrats opposed the legislation, compared to 73 percent of Republicans in favor.
As for the Trump‐Musk feud, 40 percent of respondents said they believe Musk’s critique is “motivated by genuine concern about wasteful spending,” while 48 percent view it as “a self‐serving attempt to influence policy to benefit his business interests.” Another 12 percent had no opinion. Notably, 65 percent of independents said they closely follow Musk’s statements on fiscal issues, suggesting that his stance may carry weight beyond Tesla investors.
Younger Voters and the EV Credit Debate
Among voters aged 18–34—a demographic that skews more environmentally conscious—58 percent said they would be “less likely” to vote for a candidate who opposed all EV incentives. By contrast, just 22 percent of voters over age 65 said they opposed cutting EV credits. This generational gap highlights the rising salience of clean‐energy policy in electoral politics.
Implications for “MAGA” Donor Influence
Musk’s defiance represents an unusual break from the typical pattern of large GOP donors falling in line behind the party platform. “We’ve never seen a billionaire of Musk’s stature publicly turn on the president with whom he worked so closely,” said political analyst Claire Fox of the Brookings Institution. “It underscores how business‐friendly factions within the Republican coalition may clash over the details of tax and energy policy—particularly as the GOP tries to balance climate considerations with traditional oil and gas interests.”
If Musk’s criticism persuades moderate Republicans in swing states like Pennsylvania and Michigan—where EV manufacturing and clean‐energy jobs are significant—the bill could face further difficulty in the Senate. Republican senators from those states (e.g., Sen. J.D. Vance in Ohio or Sen. Rob Portman in Michigan) must weigh the economic importance of EV production against the political imperative to back Trump’s top legislative priority.
Potential Fallout from the Feud
Trump’s Campaign Calculus
Trump’s personal disappointment in Musk could push him to publicly shame other Republican megadonors who dissent. “If Trump decides to brand these donors as RINOs (Republicans In Name Only), it risks alienating the financial base,” warned strategist Lila Morgan, co‐founder of Red Leaf Strategies. “No modern Republican campaign can function without major tech funding—sanctioning Musk will have ripple effects beyond this legislation.”
Despite the spat, Trump emphasized he still respects Musk’s entrepreneurial acumen. “Elon is a genius engineer. But when it comes to policy, I need people who will stand with me on big fights. If he can’t do that, we’ll find another partner,” Trump said.
Musk’s Future Political Involvement
It remains unclear whether Musk intends to scale back his Republican contributions or if he will leverage his influence on other public policy fronts. His immediate focus appears to be Tesla, SpaceX, and his new ventures (including the social media platform X). Nonetheless, Musk’s statements signal he may become a more vocal fiscal hawk, campaigning for balanced budgets and avoidance of deficit‐financed giveaways.
Political donors and strategists will watch carefully for Musk’s next moves: Will he quietly fund alternative Republican factions aligned with fiscal conservatism? Or will he attempt to recruit other business leaders to his cause, forming a “fiscal responsibility” coalition that challenges the Trump‐MAGA orthodoxy?
Conclusion: An Ongoing Battle Over America’s Fiscal Future
The Trump–Musk feud over the “big, beautiful bill” highlights the fraught intersection of politics, business interests, and public policy. As the U.S. Congress grapples with the urgent need to raise the debt ceiling—an act that historically commands bipartisan cooperation—Trump’s drive to pair this measure with sweeping tax cuts and spending reversals has provoked internal GOP dissent from one of its most influential financiers and public figures.
Musk’s outspoken condemnation centers on both a philosophical objection to perpetual deficit spending and frustration that EV tax credits—an incentive essential to his own industry—would be curtailed. Trump, in turn, accuses Musk of betraying a once‐cordial alliance now that the Tesla CEO’s commercial calculus has shifted.
With the legislation heading to a pivotal Senate vote in coming days, the rift between Trump and Musk will continue to loom large. If GOP moderates, swayed by Musk’s critique or by constituents worried about weakened EV incentives, cast critical votes against the bill, the debt ceiling package could unravel. A failed debt‐limit increase would force drastic spending cuts across the federal government or trigger an unprecedented U.S. default with catastrophic consequences for global financial markets.
Even if the debt ceiling hike narrowly passes, the broader bill’s tax cuts and spending reductions will likely reshape domestic policy for years, with analysts warning of deeper social safety net retrenchments and greater income inequality. Meanwhile, the precedent of a major Republican donor defying the party’s leader underscores emerging fissures within the conservative coalition: between “small government” libertarians and “MAGA” nationalists who prioritize Trump’s core agenda.
Ultimately, the Trump–Musk standoff is about more than just electric vehicle credits; it is a bellwether of how American politics will reconcile big‐ticket legislation, donor influence, and the evolving priorities of an energy transition. The bill’s fate—and the ongoing rancor between two of the most prominent figures on the right—will leave a lasting imprint on this fraught moment in U.S. fiscal and political history.
READ MORE: Colorado Firebomb Attack Suspect’s Family Detained for Deportation
