When a major bank locked customers out of their accounts for seven weeks, public outrage would have been immediate. Australians rely on their superannuation funds in a way similar to bank accounts—yet industry super fund HESTA recently did just that. From mid-April until early June, over one million HESTA members were unable to access online account services while the fund switched administrators. HESTA insisted the outage would deliver “a better experience” in the long run. But for many members—with bills to pay, mortgages to settle, or urgent expenses to meet—that rationale rang hollow. The seven-week outage forced consumers to scramble for workarounds, in some cases risking financial stress.
This article explores why Australian super funds hold a social licence to operate, how HESTA’s prolonged service suspension has undermined trust, and what this incident reveals about the broader state of customer service in the superannuation industry.
1. Super Funds and Their Implicit Social Licence
1.1 The Unspoken Contract Between Funds and Members
Superannuation is compulsory in Australia, meaning employees have no choice but to channel a portion of their wages into a regulated fund. Most workers are not engaging with super by preference; they have been enrolled automatically through employer contributions. As a result, industry and retail funds must earn members’ trust because switching providers is often viewed as complicated or burdensome—especially for younger or lower-income Australians who may not track super closely.
Because super balances often represent a lifetime of contributions and investments, funds must uphold an implicit social licence: the understanding that they will act in members’ best financial interests and provide reliable service. Unlike bank customers, who can move money out of an account at any time, super members face legislative and practical constraints on withdrawals. Trustees are legally bound to prioritize member outcomes; failing that trust risks public backlash and regulatory scrutiny.
1.2 Industry Funds: Member-Owned, Member-Focused
Industry super funds like HESTA are structured as not-for-profit organizations “run by members, for members.” In theory, this model aligns the fund’s incentives with those of its contributors, rather than external shareholders. Members expect transparency, prompt service, and cost-effective investment management on par with their best interests. Any sign of underinvestment in technology or poor communication can therefore be perceived not merely as an operational hiccup but as a breach of the social contract.
1.3 Customer Expectations for Reliability and Access
Members do not log into their super accounts daily; many only do so when making decisions about contributions, investment options, insurance, or retirement planning. However, when an individual requires a lump-sum withdrawal—whether to pay for a home deposit, medical treatment, or funeral expenses—the timing is often urgent. A multi-week outage can have significant consequences, from delayed property settlements to emotional stress over an inability to access death benefits. Super funds’ reputations hinge on maintaining seamless service, particularly during critical life events.
2. HESTA’s Seven-Week Service Suspension
2.1 Background: The Switch to a New Administrator
In early 2025, HESTA announced a transition from its existing administration provider to a new technology platform. The rationale was to modernize systems and deliver “more personalized experiences” for members. The fund advised that, from mid-April, members would face a “limited services period,” during which online account access would be suspended. Communications on HESTA’s website suggested members contact the fund for urgent withdrawals.
2.2 Member Experience: Confusion, Stress, and Delayed Transactions
Despite warnings, many members reported learning about the outage only when they attempted to log in. Others received notices months earlier but found that requests for advance withdrawals—meant to cover “urgent” needs—were not handled in a timely way. Messages sent to HESTA went unanswered for days, leaving some members scrambling to borrow from friends and family.
Adelaide Miller, an ABC News reporter, received dozens of messages from members facing financial stress: a homeowner on the brink of losing a property settlement, a widow awaiting a death benefit to cover funeral costs, and casual workers needing early access to pay rent. In each case, a direct appeal to HESTA’s media contacts prompted the fund to process the payment. While those members avoided disaster, countless others—who never contacted the media—remained in limbo.
2.3 Timeline and Communication Shortcomings
- February 2025: HESTA announces the planned switch and “limited services period” on its website and via email newsletters.
- Mid-April 2025: Online login and most account functions go offline. Notices on the HESTA website instruct members to call for urgent payment requests.
- April–May 2025: Members attempt to withdraw funds but face long call-center wait times. HESTA’s website often displays “high volume” messages.
- Late May 2025: Social media and consumer groups begin highlighting individual hardship cases, prompting limited media coverage.
- June 2, 2025: HESTA restores full access but acknowledges extended call-center delays and apologizes for the inconvenience.
Across this timeline, HESTA relied heavily on its website communications, assuming members would proactively read notices and request urgent transactions in advance. However, many members—especially those not tracking their super closely—did not anticipate needing urgent access until the outage was already underway.
3. Regulatory and Industry Responses
3.1 Consumer Advocacy Groups Sound the Alarm
Super Consumers Australia—a consumer advocacy group—accused HESTA of underinvesting in technology and lacking strategic foresight. They argued that no super fund should lock out members for months, regardless of the promised benefits. The Financial Rights Legal Centre also urged regulators to investigate whether HESTA breached its fiduciary duties by creating “unacceptable barriers” to accessing funds.
3.2 Industry Fund Peers and Comparisons
Other large industry funds—such as AustralianSuper and First State Super—have faced technology challenges but typically provided rolling updates and phased outages, allowing members at least limited ability to view balances and request withdrawals. By contrast, HESTA’s complete lockdown was unprecedented in scope and duration, prompting commentators to ask why the fund did not adopt a staged approach.
3.3 Regulatory Backdrop: APRA’s Oversight
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) oversees super funds’ operational resilience. While APRA has historically focused on financial sustainability and capital adequacy, outages of this duration could trigger closer scrutiny. APRA guidelines emphasize robust business-continuity plans, including disaster recovery, cyber resilience, and member communication protocols. A seven-week planned outage may not violate specific rules, but it highlights potential gaps in ensuring members’ best interests during system upgrades.
4. Assessing the Impact on HESTA’s Social Licence
4.1 Trust Erosion Among Members
Super funds earn members’ confidence over decades by delivering strong returns, low fees, and reliable service. HESTA’s service suspension has damaged that trust. Surveys conducted since the outage reveal that roughly 30 percent of contacting members are considering switching funds once the systems are restored. Loss of confidence could lead to lower member engagement, reduced willingness to contribute extra voluntary amounts, or even early retirement withdrawals if members fear future lockouts.
4.2 Reputation Versus Performance
Before the outage, HESTA ranked highly for investment performance and low fees among health and community services workers. Yet, performance metrics alone no longer suffice to maintain a social licence. In an environment where members can consolidate multiple super accounts or consolidate under an SMSF, a reputational blot can translate into lost members. HESTA’s management must now demonstrate that the outage was a one-off and that future service interruptions will be minimal.
4.3 The Role of Communication and Transparency
The fund’s reliance on website notices overlooked that a significant proportion of members rarely log in. In contrast, funds that leverage SMS alerts, direct phone outreach, and social media updates tend to keep members better informed. HESTA’s failure to segment communications—sending tailored notices to retirees, first-home buyers, and those with recent queries—led to mixed understanding of “urgent” transaction eligibility.
Moving forward, HESTA must build a transparent communications strategy:
- Pre-upgrade briefings: Webinars and SMS updates explaining the reasons and likely member impact.
- Dedicated hotlines: Separate phone lines for urgent requests, staffed by trained representatives.
- Real-time status dashboards: Online project trackers showing progress on the switch, anticipated milestones, and remaining risks.
5. Broader Lessons for Australia’s Super System
5.1 The Perils of Underinvesting in Member-Centric Technology
Many super funds continue to rely on legacy administration platforms. Any migration to newer systems inherently carries risk, but the absence of robust member testing and contingency planning can magnify disruptions. Funds should:
- Adopt phased rollouts: Migrating small segments of members first to identify glitches.
- Conduct full-scale dry runs: Including simulated weekend or end-of-financial-year scenarios to stress-test systems.
- Allocate dedicated change-management teams: Who liaise with IT, operations, and member services to manage the human impact of technical projects.
5.2 Strengthening the “Duty of Care” Ethos
Trustees are legally required to act in members’ best financial interests, but that duty extends to service delivery. Regulators may soon expect funds to demonstrate that system upgrades do not impose “unreasonable hardship” on members. Industry bodies such as the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) could update best-practice guidelines to mandate comprehensive member impact assessments before planned outages.
5.3 Competition and Innovation in the Super Sector
As open banking and fintech-driven aggregators gain traction, members increasingly compare super fund performance not only on returns but on digital experience. Funds that prioritize mobile-first platforms, real-time reporting, and interactive planning tools can differentiate themselves. HESTA’s outage highlights that digital maturity is no longer optional—it is a competitive necessity.
6. Rebuilding HESTA’s Member Trust
6.1 Immediate Remedial Actions
In the weeks following restoration of services, HESTA should:
- Offer compensation: Fee rebates or small goodwill payments to affected members. A nominal payment—say, $50 to each member—signals acknowledgment of inconvenience and genuine remorse.
- Fast-track urgent requests: Especially for retirees, first-home buyers, and members facing hardship. A dedicated “expedited access” unit can process withdrawals within 48 hours.
- Host town-hall sessions: Online and in major cities (Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane) to explain lessons learned and solicit direct feedback from members.
6.2 Long-Term Strategy for Service Excellence
Beyond immediate fixes, HESTA must demonstrate ongoing commitment to member-focused innovation:
- Invest in cybersecurity and redundancy: Ensuring that single points of failure are eliminated by replicating data centers and enforcing multi-factor authentication.
- Enhance self-service capabilities: Offering 24/7 chatbots and AI-powered virtual assistants that can guide members through common tasks even if core systems are offline.
- Establish a member advisory board: Made up of retirees, casual workers, and industry employees to advise on service priorities and test new features before rollout.
6.3 Engaging Regulators and Industry Bodies
HESTA’s board must proactively engage APRA and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to explain how the outage deviated from policy expectations, outline corrective actions, and commit to independent review. Collaboration with industry associations can yield updated guidelines, ensuring that no fund repeats such a prolonged service disruption.
7. Conclusion: The Future of HESTA’s Social Licence
HESTA’s seven-week outage was a stark reminder that super funds, though not banks, hold vast sums of member money—often accumulated over decades—and must operate with reliability akin to everyday deposit accounts. The concept of a social licence to operate applies equally: members expect service continuity, transparent communication, and timely access—especially during life’s critical moments.
Rebuilding trust will require more than restoration of online services; it demands tangible actions to show members that HESTA’s “switch” was a necessary step toward better technology, and that future disruptions will be minimal. By offering compensation, fast-tracking urgent withdrawals, and implementing robust change-management practices, HESTA can begin to repair its reputation.
For the broader superannuation industry, HESTA’s experience underscores the importance of member-centric planning and enhanced regulatory oversight of operational resilience. As digital transformation accelerates across financial services, super funds must balance innovation with unwavering duty of care. Only then can they maintain the implicit social contract that keeps over $4 trillion in Australian workers’ hands—and minds—confident in the system that manages their financial future.
READ MORE: Property Prices Lift in May as Interest Rates Fall, Analysts Expect Rises of Up to 10% by Early 2026
